Only through teaching can you truly say, you have learned.
This unique take on professional practice also allowed me to fulfill a need--teaching. It began with serving as a teaching assistant with UT: Winedale Preservation Institute/UH: Workshop for Historic Architecture joint program and then have a full adjunct position, teaching for the next 16 years at the Hines College of Architecture at the University of Houston. I helped develop and then directed the award winning, Summer HABS program and eventually the summer study abroad program, the International Workshop for Historic Architecture. The last 8 years also teaching the introductory course in Historic Preservation and serving as a design critic with Barry M. Moore, FAIA in a fifth year design studio.
The documentation process is simple: draw what we see, everything we see, just as it sits, as precisely as possible. Nothing more and nothing less. If you can’t see it you can’t draw it. Assumptions and interpretations are not allowed.
In those years my students distinguished themselves with AIA Houston awards for research and documentation, three national awards in the Petersen Awards Competition, documentation of three UNESCO World Heritage sites in rural Mexico, nine documented projects submitted to the Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) collection in the Library of Congress, and neighborhood and community research projects too numerous to mention. Along the way our students have acquired the tools of research, an intimate knowledge of how buildings are put together, and the skill of seeing by sketching. The professional lives of these alumni were extraordinarily enriched, as did the communities which enlisted their help
Today, we are rediscovering the worth, the need even, for the preservation of the planet on which we live. Whether ecological, cultural, historic or built, the entire scope of that preservation is vast and relevant within our study of architecture. Most architectural education in the United States devotes most of its resources to the “length, width and height” of each of those four parts. Our program understood and taught the worth of an additional dimension: time. To understand the importance of time, we found that it is best learned by experiencing and touching the actual building, its context, and the people of that place, who through their interaction, have given that structure its worth. We contend that only through on site documentation, or “reverse design” — taking the building apart (on paper), piece by piece — can that understanding be authentically achieved.
This is essentially the process of documentation of architecture of any kind or any size. Because of the size and complexity of different types of architecture that we tackled and completed, we always endeavored to keep abreast and implement the latest technology available, to give the students the best education possible. The creation and use of “as-built” documentation is an essential part everyday professional practice. That’s why we stressed this as an essential skill for our students, not just some academic exercise.
The slides and drawings shown above and below are about the documentation of the Puente Major de la Aqueducto de Tembelque, Tepeyahualco, Hidalgo, Mexico. The largest building ever attempted by the program--a mere 1.23 meters 94 feet) wide at the top and at the thickest, 2.5 meters (8 feet) at the bottom, but it was 1,020 meters long (3,346 ft. or 2/3 of the mile).